Integrating Object and Meta-Level Value Based Argumentation

نویسندگان

  • Sanjay Modgil
  • Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
چکیده

A recent extension to Dung’s argumentation framework allows for arguments to express preferences between other arguments. Value based argumentation can be formalised in this extended framework, enabling meta-level argumentation about the values that arguments promote, and the orderings on these values. In this paper, we show how extended frameworks integrating meta-level reasoning about values can be rewritten as Dung frameworks, and show a soundness and completeness result with respect to the rewrites. We then describe how value orderings can emerge, or be ‘formed’, as a result of dialogue games based on the rewritten frameworks, and illustrate the advantages of this approach over existing dialogue games for value based argumentation frameworks.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Meta-level Argumentation with Argument Schemes

Arguments in real-world decision making, for example in medical or engineering domains, are often based on patterns of informal argumentation, called argument schemes. In order to improve automated tool support of decision making in such domains, a formal model of argument schemes appears necessary. To address this need, we represent each argument scheme as a defeasible rule in the meta-languag...

متن کامل

Argumentation vs Meta-argumentation for the Assessment of Multi-agent Conflict

Comparative analysis of argumentation and metaargumentation is conducted to track the plausibility of scenarios of interaction between agents. Metaargumentation deals with the overall structure of a scenario, which included communicative actions in addition to attack relations and is learned from previous experience of multiagent interactions. Object-level argumentation is a traditional machine...

متن کامل

Integrating Dialectical and Accrual Modes of Argumentation

This paper argues that accrual should be modelled in terms of reasoning about the application of preferences to sets of arguments, and shows how such reasoning can be formalised within metalevel argumentation frameworks. These frameworks adopt the same machinery and level of abstraction as Dung’s argumentation framework. We thus provide a dialectical argumentation semantics that integrates accr...

متن کامل

Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus

We present a formal model of argumentation based on situation calculus which captures both the logical and the procedural aspects of argumentation processes. The logic is used to determine what is accepted by each agent participating in the discussion and by the group as a whole, on the basis of the speech acts performed during argumentation. Argumentation protocols, also called rules of order,...

متن کامل

Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks

Hierarchical argumentation frameworks organise Dung argumentation frameworks into a hierarchy so that argumentation over preference information in a level n Dung framework is used to resolve conflicts between arguments in a level n1 framework. In this paper we formalise and extend value based argumentation [1] in a hierarchical argumentation framework and illustrate application of the resulting...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008